Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Willie Dobson v. D.R. Camden, 82-2066 (1983)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 82-2066 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 20, 1983
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 709 F.2d 7 Willie DOBSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.R. CAMDEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 82-2066. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 20, 1983. D. Reid Walker, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant. Lovell W. Aldrich, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; John V. Singleton, Judge. SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion May 26, 1983, 5 Cir., 1983, 705 F.2d 759 ) Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GO
More

709 F.2d 7

Willie DOBSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
D.R. CAMDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 82-2066.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

June 20, 1983.

D. Reid Walker, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Lovell W. Aldrich, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; John V. Singleton, Judge.

SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion May 26, 1983, 5 Cir., 1983, 705 F.2d 759)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GOLDBERG, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer