Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Josephine Victorian and Ruth Helen Jones v. Barbara Miller, Supervisor, 85-2494 (1986)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 85-2494 Visitors: 28
Filed: Dec. 02, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 806 F.2d 81 Josephine VICTORIAN and Ruth Helen Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Barbara MILLER, Supervisor, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 85-2494. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Dec. 2, 1986. Jeffrey J. Skarda, Gulf Coast Legal Foundation, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants. Joseph W. Barbisch, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Robert O'Connor and Norman W. Blac
More

806 F.2d 81

Josephine VICTORIAN and Ruth Helen Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Barbara MILLER, Supervisor, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-2494.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 2, 1986.

Jeffrey J. Skarda, Gulf Coast Legal Foundation, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Joseph W. Barbisch, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Robert O'Connor and Norman W. Black, Judges.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

1

(Opinion August 4, 1986, 5 Cir., 1986, 796 F.2d 94)

BY THE COURT:

2

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer