Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Howard M. Rosenstein v. The City of Dallas, Texas, 87-1888 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 87-1888 Visitors: 46
Filed: Sep. 07, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 884 F.2d 174 Howard M. ROSENSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 87-1888. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Sept. 7, 1989. Sam A. Lindsay, Chandra V. Fripp, Asst. City Attys., Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellant. Bruce A. Pauley, Lyon & Lyon, Rowlett, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion June 28, 1989, 5 Cir., 1989, 876
More

884 F.2d 174

Howard M. ROSENSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-1888.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1989.

Sam A. Lindsay, Chandra V. Fripp, Asst. City Attys., Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Bruce A. Pauley, Lyon & Lyon, Rowlett, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 28, 1989, 5 Cir., 1989, 876 F.2d 392)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer