Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

89-1995 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 89-1995 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 25, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 914 F.2d 66 Rosemarie CHRISTOPHERSEN, Surviving Spouse of Albert Roy Christophersen, deceased and Steven Roy Christophersen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALLIED-SIGNAL CORPORATION, Inco Alloys International, Inc., United Catalysts, Inc., The Hall Chemical Company, Marathon Manufacturing Company, and CP Chemicals, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-1995. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Sept. 25, 1990. Paul Colley, Jr., Law Offices of Paul Colley, Jr., Tyler, Tex., Christophersen, et a
More

914 F.2d 66

Rosemarie CHRISTOPHERSEN, Surviving Spouse of Albert Roy
Christophersen, deceased and Steven Roy
Christophersen, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ALLIED-SIGNAL CORPORATION, Inco Alloys International, Inc.,
United Catalysts, Inc., The Hall Chemical Company,
Marathon Manufacturing Company, and CP
Chemicals, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-1995.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 25, 1990.

Paul Colley, Jr., Law Offices of Paul Colley, Jr., Tyler, Tex., Christophersen, et al.

Steve Schoettmer, P. Jefferson Ballew, Thompson & Knight, Dallas, Tex., for Allied-Signal, Inc.

Marc A. Sheiness, Hirsch, Glover, Robinson & Sheiness, Houston, Tex., for Inco Alloys Intern'l, Inc.

Pat Beard, Beard & Kultgen, Waco, Tex., for United Catalysts, Inc.

Michael W. Huddleston, Teresa Bohne, Stan Thiebaud, R. Brent Cooper, Cowles & Thompson, Dallas, Tex., for Hall Chemical Co.

Clifton T. Hutchison, Hughes & Luce, James J. Juneau, Strasburger & Price, Dallas, Tex., for Marathon Manuf.

Jeff Kinsel, Elizabeth S. Miller, Frederick deB. Bostwick, III, Naman, Howell, Smith & Lee, Waco, Tex., for CP Chemicals, Inc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Walter Smith, Jr., Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 4, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 902 F.2d 362)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

*

Judge Politz is recused, and therefore did not participate in this decision

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer