Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

89-2816 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 89-2816 Visitors: 85
Filed: Apr. 01, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 958 F.2d 615 MCORP FINANCIAL, INC., MCorp Mgt. and MCorp., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Official Creditors' Committee of MCorp, MCorp Financial, Inc., and MCorp Mgt., Intervenors-Appellees, v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM OF the UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-2816. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 1, 1992. Jeffrey Clair, William Kanter, Asst. Attys. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div./Appellate Staff, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant. H
More

958 F.2d 615

MCORP FINANCIAL, INC., MCorp Mgt. and MCorp., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
and
Official Creditors' Committee of MCorp, MCorp Financial,
Inc., and MCorp Mgt., Intervenors-Appellees,
v.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM OF the UNITED
STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-2816.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

April 1, 1992.

Jeffrey Clair, William Kanter, Asst. Attys. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div./Appellate Staff, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant.

Harvey R. Miller, Alan B. Miller, D.J. Baker, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, Howard N. Cayne, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D.C., for MCorp, et al.

John P. Lynch, Deborah Corthier Paskin, Latham & Watkins, Chicago, Ill., Robert J. Rosenberg, Latham & Watkins, New York City, for Official Creditors, et al.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Lynn N. Hughes, Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WILLIAMS and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This case has been remanded to us by the Supreme Court, 112 S. Ct. 459, 116 L. Ed. 2d 358 (1991), for disposition consistent with its opinion. The Court concluded that the district court was without jurisdiction to entertain this suit. Accordingly, the injunction entered by the district court is vacated, and the action dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer