Filed: Sep. 28, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30770 Summary Calendar TAMMY LEONARD, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JERRY GAUTREAUX, Individually and as Fire Chief of the Bayou Cane Volunteer Fire Department; BAYOU CANE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT; TERREBONNE PARISH FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Nos. 1, 2, 3; TERREBONNE PARISH COUNCIL; TERREBONNE PARISH CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT; AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION; CHRIS HUBBELL, Defendants- Appellants. - - Appeal from the United
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-30770 Summary Calendar TAMMY LEONARD, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JERRY GAUTREAUX, Individually and as Fire Chief of the Bayou Cane Volunteer Fire Department; BAYOU CANE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT; TERREBONNE PARISH FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Nos. 1, 2, 3; TERREBONNE PARISH COUNCIL; TERREBONNE PARISH CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT; AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION; CHRIS HUBBELL, Defendants- Appellants. - - Appeal from the United ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-30770
Summary Calendar
TAMMY LEONARD,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JERRY GAUTREAUX, Individually and as Fire Chief of the Bayou
Cane Volunteer Fire Department; BAYOU CANE VOLUNTEER FIRE
DEPARTMENT; TERREBONNE PARISH FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,
Nos. 1, 2, 3; TERREBONNE PARISH COUNCIL; TERREBONNE PARISH
CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT; AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE
CORPORATION; CHRIS HUBBELL,
Defendants-
Appellants.
------------------------------- -----
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 97-CV-198-S
------------------------------- -----
September 25, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM:*
Jerry Gautreaux et al., appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for sanctions
against Tammy Leonard under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. The appellants argue that Leonard should be
sanctioned because she “intentionally asserted a false claim and lied under oath” in order to harass
and otherwise harm Gautreaux. Review of the record does not indicate that the district court
abused its discretion in refusing to grant sanctions under Rule 11. See Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx
Corp.,
496 U.S. 384, 402 (1990).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-30770
-2-
AFFIRMED.