Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Kates, 03-10144 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-10144 Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 16, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 16, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10144 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID EARL KATES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:97-CR-42-1 - Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* David Earl Kates, federal prisoner
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS         October 16, 2003
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk

                           No. 03-10144
                         Summary Calendar



                     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                        Plaintiff-Appellee,

                              versus

                         DAVID EARL KATES,

                       Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 2:97-CR-42-1
                       --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     David Earl Kates, federal prisoner #30428-077, appeals from

the denial of his motion for reduction of his sentence.     He argues

that his offense level under United States Sentencing Guidelines §

4B1.1 was incorrectly calculated.   Because the district court was

without authority to modify the imposed term, the denial of the

motion for a sentence reduction is AFFIRMED.     See United States v.




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 03-10144
                               -2-

Bridges, 
116 F.3d 1110
, 1112 (5th Cir. 1997).   Kates’ motion to

file his reply brief out-of-time is GRANTED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer