Filed: Jul. 27, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 27, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-11287 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT CECIL PERRY, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CR-241-5 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Robert Cecil
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 27, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-11287 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT CECIL PERRY, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CR-241-5 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Robert Cecil ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 27, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-11287
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT CECIL PERRY,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:01-CR-241-5
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Robert Cecil Perry has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Perry has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue in Perry’s appeal from the
revocation of his supervised release because Perry already has
completely served his sentence. See United States v. Clark,
193
F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999) (dismissal for mootness).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-11287
-2-
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED.