Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Samuel Riddle v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 86-5228 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 86-5228 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 09, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 823 F.2d 164 Samuel RIDDLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 86-5228. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 9, 1987. Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, and ENGEL, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILLBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides
More

823 F.2d 164

Samuel RIDDLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 86-5228.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 9, 1987.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, and ENGEL, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILLBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court, 817 F.2d 1238, is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer