Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jimmie Maurice Pettit v. William Casey P. W. Keohane, Warden Patrick T. Casey and Queen Thomas, 87-5124 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 87-5124 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 02, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 822 F.2d 59 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Jimmie Maurice PETTIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William CASEY; P. W. Keohane, Warden; Patrick T. Casey; and Queen Thomas, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-5124 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 2,
More

822 F.2d 59

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Jimmie Maurice PETTIT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William CASEY; P. W. Keohane, Warden; Patrick T. Casey; and
Queen Thomas, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-5124

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 2, 1987.

W.D. Tenn.

AFFIRMED.

ORDER

Before MERRITT, MARTIN and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges.

1

This pro se plaintiff seeks review of a judgment of the district court which dismissed his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Appellant has also filed motions for a preliminary injunction and to hold defendants in contempt. Upon examination of the record and the plaintiff's brief, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

For the reasons stated in the district court's order of January 21, 1987, its final judgment entered on January 28, 1987, is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Furthermore, the motions for a preliminary injunction and to hold defendants in contempt are denied.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer