Filed: Nov. 10, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 42 F.3d 319 SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EATHERLY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant, City of White House, TN., a Municipal Corp., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-5898. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 10, 1994. Prior report: 36 F.3d 540 . Before: KENNEDY, RYAN, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other a
Summary: 42 F.3d 319 SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EATHERLY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant, City of White House, TN., a Municipal Corp., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-5898. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 10, 1994. Prior report: 36 F.3d 540 . Before: KENNEDY, RYAN, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other ac..
More
42 F.3d 319
SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EATHERLY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant,
City of White House, TN., a Municipal Corp., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-5898.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 10, 1994.
Prior report: 36 F.3d 540.
Before: KENNEDY, RYAN, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and no judge of this court having requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original hearing panel.
2
The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
