Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robert B. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, 94-1896 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 94-1896 Visitors: 24
Filed: Nov. 07, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 102 F.3d 204 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2064 Robert B. SPRAGUE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 94-1896 to 94-1898, 94-1937. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Nov. 7, 1996. Prior report: 92 F.3d 1425 . Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court
More

102 F.3d 204

20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2064

Robert B. SPRAGUE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 94-1896 to 94-1898, 94-1937.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 7, 1996.

Prior report: 92 F.3d 1425.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and the case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

It is further ORDERED that the appellees/cross-appellants file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, December 20, 1996, and the appellant/cross-appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, February 10, 1997. Reargument will be scheduled for Wednesday, April 23, 1997.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer