Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Timothy Gordon Faasse, 98-2337 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 98-2337 Visitors: 24
Filed: Dec. 01, 2000
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 234 F.3d 312 (6th Cir. 2000) United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Gordon Faasse, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-2337 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT December 1, 2000 Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge, MERRITT, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges. Prior report: 227 F.3d 660 ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth
More

234 F.3d 312 (6th Cir. 2000)

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy Gordon Faasse, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 98-2337

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

December 1, 2000

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge, MERRITT, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 227 F.3d 660

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

2

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, January 5, 2001, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, February 12, 2001.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer