Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-1687 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 95-1687 Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 105 F.3d 329 PEABODY COAL COMPANY, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, and Old Republic Insurance Company, Petitioner, v. Anabelle SPESE, Widow of John Spese, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondent-Cross-Respondent. Nos. 95-1687, 95-1709. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Nov. 25, 1996. Petition to Review an Order of the Benefits Review Board, United States Department of Labor, No. 90-BLA-1856. Be
More

105 F.3d 329

PEABODY COAL COMPANY, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent,
and
Old Republic Insurance Company, Petitioner,
v.
Anabelle SPESE, Widow of John Spese, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner,
and
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United
States Department of Labor, Respondent-Cross-Respondent.

Nos. 95-1687, 95-1709.

United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.

Nov. 25, 1996.

Petition to Review an Order of the Benefits Review Board, United States Department of Labor, No. 90-BLA-1856.

Before CUMMINGS, ESCHBACH and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

On consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc filed by petitioners, cross-respondents and respondent-cross-petitioner on October 15, 1996, a vote of the active judges of the court was requested. A majority of the judges in regular active service voted to rehear this case en banc. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the opinion entered in this case on August 29, 1996, 94 F.3d 369, be, and is hereby, VACATED.

1

This case will be reheard en banc, December 18, 1996.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer