Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Zane Holder v. Illinois Department of Correct, 12-1456 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 12-1456
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Nov. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 November 2, 2015 Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge No. 12-1456 ZANE HOLDER, Appeal from the United States District Court Plaintiff-Appellee, for the Southern District of Illinois. v. No. 09 C 1082 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF J. Phil Gilbert, CORRECTIONS and ILLINOIS Judge DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Defendants-Appellants. ORDER The man
More
              United States Court of Appeals
                                  For the Seventh Circuit
                                  Chicago, Illinois 60604

                                     November 2, 2015

                                           Before

                             RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

                             MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

                             ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 12-1456

ZANE HOLDER,                                  Appeal from the United States District Court
         Plaintiff-Appellee,                  for the Southern District of Illinois.

       v.                                     No. 09 C 1082

ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF                        J. Phil Gilbert,
CORRECTIONS and ILLINOIS                      Judge
DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL
MANAGEMENT SERVICES,
           Defendants-Appellants.

                                         ORDER

      The mandate is RECALLED for the limited purpose of correcting this Court’s
opinion of May 2, 2014. That opinion is corrected as follows:

        On page 15 of the opinion, the parenthetical explanation immediately following
the citation to Darst v. Interstate Brands Corp., 
512 F.3d 903
, 907, 911-12 (7th Cir. 2008) is
amended as follows: (When the employee returned from his July 29th, August 2d and
3d leave, the company immediately terminated him for taking leave to which he had
not been entitled under the FMLA as he was not seeking treatment for alcoholism at the
time).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer