Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Thurman Brown v. E.W. Bliss Co., E.W. Bliss Co., Inc., and W.H.B. Co., Inc., 86-1761 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 86-1761 Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 10, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 831 F.2d 810 Thurman BROWN, Appellant, v. E.W. BLISS CO., E.W. Bliss Co., Inc., and W.H.B. Co., Inc., Appellees. No. 86-1761. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 12, 1987. Decided Oct. 26, 1987. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Dec. 10, 1987. Timothy W. Monsees, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant. William T. Smith III, Kansas City, Mo., for appellees. Before HEANEY, Circuit Judge, BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 On May 26, 1987
More

831 F.2d 810

Thurman BROWN, Appellant,
v.
E.W. BLISS CO., E.W. Bliss Co., Inc., and W.H.B. Co., Inc., Appellees.

No. 86-1761.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 12, 1987.
Decided Oct. 26, 1987.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Dec. 10, 1987.

Timothy W. Monsees, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

William T. Smith III, Kansas City, Mo., for appellees.

Before HEANEY, Circuit Judge, BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

On May 26, 1987, we filed our opinion in this case affirming the judgment of the District Court, which dismissed the complaint with prejudice, 818 F.2d 1405. On September 1, 1987, the panel granted rehearing, thus vacating the opinion and judgment previously filed.

2

After hearing reargument and carefully considering the positions of the parties, the panel has decided to adhere to its original opinion. The opinion previously filed, and the judgment previously entered in accordance with it, are therefore hereby reinstated.

3

It is so ordered.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer