Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

C. Michael Anderson, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Frank X. Hopkins, Appellant/cross-Appellee, 96-1305 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 96-1305 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 23, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 122 F.3d 1160 C. Michael ANDERSON, Appellee/Cross-appellant, v. Frank X. HOPKINS, Appellant/Cross-appellee. Nos. 96-1305, 96-1306. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Sept. 23, 1997. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges. 1 Prior report: 113 F.3d 825 . ORDER 2 This matter is before us on motions filed by the parties. Upon careful consideration, we order the following. 3
More

122 F.3d 1160

C. Michael ANDERSON, Appellee/Cross-appellant,
v.
Frank X. HOPKINS, Appellant/Cross-appellee.

Nos. 96-1305, 96-1306.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 23, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

1

Prior report: 113 F.3d 825.

ORDER

2

This matter is before us on motions filed by the parties. Upon careful consideration, we order the following.

3

Petitioner C. Michael Anderson's motion to stay or recall the mandate is denied.

4

Upon review of the state's motion for modification of this court's order in Anderson v. Hopkins, 113 F.3d 825, 832 (8th Cir.1997), we modify the first sentence of the final paragraph of the order to read as follows:

5

The order and judgment of the district court is modified to provide that petitioner's sentence will be reduced to life imprisonment, unless within one hundred and fifty (150) days of the date of our mandate in the present case, the Nebraska Supreme Court reweighs the aggravating and mitigating circumstances, conducts an independent harmless error review, or remands the case to the sentencing court for resentencing.

6

The state's motion for modification of our order is denied in all other respects.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer