Filed: Jul. 30, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-1231 _ Billy Roy Tyler, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Harrah’s Council Bluffs Casino, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: July 30, 2004 Filed: July 30, 2004 _ Before BYE, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Billy Roy Tyler appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal without prejudice of Tyler’s complaint for failure to state a claim. T
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-1231 _ Billy Roy Tyler, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Harrah’s Council Bluffs Casino, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: July 30, 2004 Filed: July 30, 2004 _ Before BYE, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Billy Roy Tyler appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal without prejudice of Tyler’s complaint for failure to state a claim. Ty..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-1231
___________
Billy Roy Tyler, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Southern
v. * District of Iowa.
*
Harrah’s Council Bluffs Casino, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: July 30, 2004
Filed: July 30, 2004
___________
Before BYE, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Billy Roy Tyler appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal without
prejudice of Tyler’s complaint for failure to state a claim. Tyler, who is African-
American, alleged he appeared at Harrah’s Casino in July 2003 to apply for a job and
was told he must apply online; a “glitch in [the] program . . . prevented [him] from
applying”; he did not see any African-Americans working at the casino; and he was
thus the victim of job discrimination.
We grant Tyler leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Having carefully reviewed
the record, we conclude preservice dismissal was inappropriate because Tyler’s
complaint, liberally construed, satisfied federal pleading requirements by providing
Harrah’s Casino notice of Tyler’s claim of race-based discrimination in its
employment-application process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2); Swierkiewicz v.
Sorema N.A.,
534 U.S. 506, 514-15 (2002); Smith v. St. Bernards Reg’l Med. Ctr.,
19 F.3d 1254, 1255 (8th Cir. 1994).
Accordingly, we reverse the dismissal and remand for further proceedings in
accordance with this opinion.
______________________________
-2-