Filed: Oct. 10, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-1823 _ David G. Jeep, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Jack A. Bennett, Associate Circuit * Judge, Camden County; Devin M. * Appeal from the United States Ledom, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, * District Court for the Camden County; Alex Little, Police * Western District of Missouri. Officer, #920, City of Osage Beach; * Tim Taylor, Police Officer, #913, City * of Osage Beach; W. Steven Rives, * [UNPUBLISHED] Prosecuting Attorney; W. James
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-1823 _ David G. Jeep, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Jack A. Bennett, Associate Circuit * Judge, Camden County; Devin M. * Appeal from the United States Ledom, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, * District Court for the Camden County; Alex Little, Police * Western District of Missouri. Officer, #920, City of Osage Beach; * Tim Taylor, Police Officer, #913, City * of Osage Beach; W. Steven Rives, * [UNPUBLISHED] Prosecuting Attorney; W. James ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-1823
___________
David G. Jeep, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Jack A. Bennett, Associate Circuit *
Judge, Camden County; Devin M. * Appeal from the United States
Ledom, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, * District Court for the
Camden County; Alex Little, Police * Western District of Missouri.
Officer, #920, City of Osage Beach; *
Tim Taylor, Police Officer, #913, City *
of Osage Beach; W. Steven Rives, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Prosecuting Attorney; W. James *
Icenogle, Prosecuting Attorney; Bruce *
Colyer, Associate Circuit Judge; Jay *
Nixon, Attorney General, State of *
Missouri; Camden County; City of *
Osage Beach; State of Missouri, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: October 6, 2008
Filed: October 10, 2008
___________
Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
David Jeep appeals the district court’s1 orders dismissing his claims against
multiple defendants and granting summary judgment to the remaining defendants in
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review, we conclude that the orders were
proper for the reasons stated by the district court and that an extended discussion is
not warranted. See Maness v. Dist. Court,
495 F.3d 943, 943-44 (8th Cir. 2007) (per
curiam) (de novo review of dismissals based on immunity); Rouse v. Benson,
193
F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 1999) (district court’s grant of summary judgment reviewed
de novo).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B,
and we deny as moot Jeep’s motion for an expedited appeal.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
-2-