Filed: Jan. 12, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1397 _ Paul Michael Blaise, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Dr. Jason Smith; PSS Hope Prentice; * Northern District of Iowa. PSS Hirschman; TPS Jennifer * Macklem, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 23, 2009 Filed: January 12, 2010 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Paul Blaise appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1397 _ Paul Michael Blaise, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Dr. Jason Smith; PSS Hope Prentice; * Northern District of Iowa. PSS Hirschman; TPS Jennifer * Macklem, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 23, 2009 Filed: January 12, 2010 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Paul Blaise appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1397
___________
Paul Michael Blaise, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Dr. Jason Smith; PSS Hope Prentice; * Northern District of Iowa.
PSS Hirschman; TPS Jennifer *
Macklem, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: November 23, 2009
Filed: January 12, 2010
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Paul Blaise appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action. Upon careful review, see Moore v. Sims,
200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th
Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (de novo review), we affirm the dismissal for the reasons
stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B. However, to the extent Blaise’s claims
for damages were dismissed pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477, 486-87
1
The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
(1994), we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice, see Schafer v. Moore,
46
F.3d 43, 45 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (dismissal under Heck should be without
prejudice so plaintiff can refile if he satisfies Heck requirements).
______________________________
-2-