Filed: Feb. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2282 _ Nicole L. Zellner lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Wells Fargo Bank; Rushmore Loan Management; U.S. Bank lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: February 19, 2016 Filed: February 24, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this action arising out of the foreclosur
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2282 _ Nicole L. Zellner lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Wells Fargo Bank; Rushmore Loan Management; U.S. Bank lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: February 19, 2016 Filed: February 24, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this action arising out of the foreclosure..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-2282
___________________________
Nicole L. Zellner
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Wells Fargo Bank; Rushmore Loan Management; U.S. Bank
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: February 19, 2016
Filed: February 24, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this action arising out of the foreclosure sale of her home, Nicole Zellner
appeals the district court’s1 grant of defendants’ motions for judgment on the
1
The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
pleadings. Following careful de novo review of the pleadings and public records
attached thereto, see Porous Media Corp. v. Pall Corp.,
186 F.3d 1077, 1079 (8th Cir.
1999), we affirm for the reasons articulated in defendants’ unopposed motions and
relied on by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Zellner’s motion to supplement
the record is denied.
______________________________
-2-