Filed: Oct. 02, 1956
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 237 F.2d 229 Leslie H. HARRY, Appellant, v. Edgar C. NEWELL, Appellee. Nos. 15239, 15240. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Oct. 2, 1956. Vergeer & Samuels, Duane Vergeer, Portland, Or., for appellant. Sabin & Malarkey, Verne W. Newcomb, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS, and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion of appellee to dismiss appeals is granted upon the ground that an appeal from an order granting a new trial is not appealable. See Bateman v.
Summary: 237 F.2d 229 Leslie H. HARRY, Appellant, v. Edgar C. NEWELL, Appellee. Nos. 15239, 15240. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Oct. 2, 1956. Vergeer & Samuels, Duane Vergeer, Portland, Or., for appellant. Sabin & Malarkey, Verne W. Newcomb, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS, and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion of appellee to dismiss appeals is granted upon the ground that an appeal from an order granting a new trial is not appealable. See Bateman v. ..
More
237 F.2d 229
Leslie H. HARRY, Appellant,
v.
Edgar C. NEWELL, Appellee.
Nos. 15239, 15240.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 2, 1956.
Vergeer & Samuels, Duane Vergeer, Portland, Or., for appellant.
Sabin & Malarkey, Verne W. Newcomb, Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before STEPHENS, CHAMBERS, and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motion of appellee to dismiss appeals is granted upon the ground that an appeal from an order granting a new trial is not appealable. See Bateman v. Donovan, 9 Cir., 1942, 131 F.2d 759; United States v. Hayes, 9 Cir., 172 F.2d 677, 679.
