Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

James Lane Kendall v. John H. Klinger, Superintendent, California Men's Colony, Los Padres, California, 21029 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 21029 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 22, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 383 F.2d 436 James Lane KENDALL, Appellant, v. John H. KLINGER, Superintendent, California Men's Colony, Los Padres, California, Appellee. No. 21029. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. August 11, 1967. Rehearing Denied September 22, 1967. James Lane Kendall, San Gabriel, Cal., for appellant in pro. per. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Robert H. Francis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, JOHNSEN and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The appeal is di
More

383 F.2d 436

James Lane KENDALL, Appellant,
v.
John H. KLINGER, Superintendent, California Men's Colony, Los Padres, California, Appellee.

No. 21029.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 11, 1967.

Rehearing Denied September 22, 1967.

James Lane Kendall, San Gabriel, Cal., for appellant in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Robert H. Francis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, JOHNSEN and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The appeal is dismissed as moot because the appellant has been released from state custody. See Parker v. Ellis, 362 U.S. 574, 80 S. Ct. 909, 4 L. Ed. 2d 963.

2

Were we to pass over this point, which we cannot, it could be suggested to appellant that he has made no attack on the first of two convictions. Thus, civil rights to vote (which he now wants to vindicate here) could not be vindicated because of the first conviction, even if we could eradicate his second conviction.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer