Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United Farm Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Board, 80-5777 (1984)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 80-5777 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 08, 1984
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 733 F.2d 78 UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 80-5777. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 8, 1984. Ellen J. Eggers, Keene, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Neil Vincent Wake, Beus, Gilbert, Wake & Morrill, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. Before FERGUSON, NELSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The court sitting en banc has affirmed the judgm
More

733 F.2d 78

UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 80-5777.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 8, 1984.

Ellen J. Eggers, Keene, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Neil Vincent Wake, Beus, Gilbert, Wake & Morrill, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees.

Before FERGUSON, NELSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The court sitting en banc has affirmed the judgment of the district court that the Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Act is facially constitutional, 727 F.2d 1475.

2

The court did not determine whether the Act is constitutional as applied in any specific instance.

3

The case is remanded to the district court with directions to permit the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to raise any issues not determined by the March 14, 1984 decision of the court sitting en banc.

4

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED for further proceedings.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer