Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Virgilio Patricio Flores, 82-1445 (1984)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 82-1445 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 08, 1984
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 732 F.2d 1438 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Virgilio Patricio FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 82-1445. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 8, 1984. Carla M. Woehrle, Talcott, Vandevelde & Woehrle, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant. William Fahey, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON,
More

732 F.2d 1438

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Virgilio Patricio FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 82-1445.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 8, 1984.

Carla M. Woehrle, Talcott, Vandevelde & Woehrle, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

William Fahey, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 729 F.2d 593, is withdrawn.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer