Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gene Andrew Austad v. Henry Risley and Thomas Sellers, and Attorney General Mike Greely, Additional And, 83-3933 (1984)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 83-3933 Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 25, 1984
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 743 F.2d 739 Gene Andrew AUSTAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Henry RISLEY and Thomas Sellers, Respondents-Appellees, and Attorney General Mike Greely, Additional Respondent and Appellee. No. 83-3933. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 25, 1984. Curtis G. Thompson, Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett & Weaver, Great Falls, Mont., for petitioner-appellant. Margaret M. Joyce Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Helena, Mont., for respondents-appellees. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WAL
More

743 F.2d 739

Gene Andrew AUSTAD, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Henry RISLEY and Thomas Sellers, Respondents-Appellees,
and
Attorney General Mike Greely, Additional Respondent and Appellee.

No. 83-3933.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 25, 1984.

Curtis G. Thompson, Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett & Weaver, Great Falls, Mont., for petitioner-appellant.

Margaret M. Joyce Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Helena, Mont., for respondents-appellees.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case 739 F.2d 428, be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer