Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. James Edward Gray, 86-3085 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 86-3085 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 24, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 833 F.2d 148 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Edward GRAY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 86-3085. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 24, 1987. G. Curtis Drake, Helena, Mont. for defendant-appellant. Byron H. Dunbar, U.S. Atty., and Carl E. Rostad, Asst. U.S. Atty., Great Falls, Mont., for plaintiff-appellee. ORDER Before ANDERSON, HUG and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 By an order entered October 5, 1987, - U.S. -, 108 S. Ct. 54 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 18 , the United States S
More

833 F.2d 148

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Edward GRAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-3085.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 24, 1987.

G. Curtis Drake, Helena, Mont. for defendant-appellant.

Byron H. Dunbar, U.S. Atty., and Carl E. Rostad, Asst. U.S. Atty., Great Falls, Mont., for plaintiff-appellee.

ORDER

Before ANDERSON, HUG and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

1

By an order entered October 5, 1987, --- U.S. ----, 108 S. Ct. 54, 98 L. Ed. 2d 18, the United States Supreme Court vacated this court's decision reported at 809 F.2d 579 and remanded for reconsideration in light of the Solicitor General's position stated in his brief filed June 17, 1987.

2

Upon reconsideration, this court's opinion filed February 3, 1987, is VACATED. The decision of the district court reported at 633 F. Supp. 1311 is VACATED and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to set aside the conviction and the jury verdict and to dismiss the Indictment.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer