Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Animal Defense Council v. Donald P. Hodel, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, Defendants-Intervenors, 86-2453 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 86-2453 Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 24, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 867 F.2d 1244 ANIMAL DEFENSE COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Donald P. HODEL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, et al., Defendants-Intervenors- Appellees. No. 86-2453. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 24, 1989. Before HUG, NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 We regret that in the opinion, published at 840 F.2d 1432 , there was an error made on page 1436, in the second column in the first full paragraph. This paragraph
More

867 F.2d 1244

ANIMAL DEFENSE COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Donald P. HODEL, et al., Defendants-Appellees,
Southern Arizona Water Resources Association, et al.,
Defendants-Intervenors- Appellees.

No. 86-2453.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 24, 1989.

Before HUG, NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

We regret that in the opinion, published at 840 F.2d 1432, there was an error made on page 1436, in the second column in the first full paragraph. This paragraph should read as follows:

2

The district court may also inquire outside of the administrative record "when it appears the agency has relied on documents or materials not included in the record." Public Power Council [v. Johnson], 674 F.2d at 794 [9th Cir. 1982]. In addition, discovery may be permitted if supplementation of the record is necessary to explain technical terms or complex subject matter involved in the agency action. Id.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer