Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Ted H. Kimball, 87-1392 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 87-1392 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 21, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 914 F.2d 1386 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ted H. KIMBALL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 87-1392. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 21, 1990. Prior report: 9th Cir., 896 F.2d 1218 . Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Up
More

914 F.2d 1386

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ted H. KIMBALL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-1392.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 21, 1990.

Prior report: 9th Cir., 896 F.2d 1218.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer