Filed: Sep. 16, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 127 F.3d 1135 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,911 James C. McDANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APPRAISAL INSTITUTE, a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of Illinois, fka American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers of the National Association of Realtors; Dan W. Mahoney, Husband; Susan Mahoney, Wife; Sanders Solot, Husband; Ruth-Jean Solot, Wife, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17158. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 16, 1997. ORDER 1 The concurring opinion, file
Summary: 127 F.3d 1135 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,911 James C. McDANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APPRAISAL INSTITUTE, a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of Illinois, fka American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers of the National Association of Realtors; Dan W. Mahoney, Husband; Susan Mahoney, Wife; Sanders Solot, Husband; Ruth-Jean Solot, Wife, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17158. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Sept. 16, 1997. ORDER 1 The concurring opinion, filed..
More
127 F.3d 1135
97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,911
James C. McDANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE, a Corporation Organized Under the Laws
of the State of Illinois, fka American Institute of Real
Estate Appraisers of the National Association of Realtors;
Dan W. Mahoney, Husband; Susan Mahoney, Wife; Sanders
Solot, Husband; Ruth-Jean Solot, Wife, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-17158.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 16, 1997.
ORDER
1
The concurring opinion, filed June 30, 1997 [117 F.3d 421], is amended as follows:
2
Delete the first full sentence on Slip Opinion page 7592 [117 F.3d at 424], starting with "The Institute ..." and replace it with: "The Institute only accepts between two and seven percent of its candidates, and MAI appraisers get over 90% of the commercial business in Southern Arizona."
3
With the above amendment, the appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED. The appellee's petition for rehearing is also DENIED.
