Filed: Apr. 07, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 138 F.3d 809 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Scott BARRON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis W. THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 96-36058, 96-36059. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 7, 1998. Before: HUG, Chief Judge. ORDER 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The th
Summary: 138 F.3d 809 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Scott BARRON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis W. THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 96-36058, 96-36059. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 7, 1998. Before: HUG, Chief Judge. ORDER 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The thr..
More
138 F.3d 809
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William Scott BARRON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dennis W. THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 96-36058, 96-36059.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
April 7, 1998.
Before: HUG, Chief Judge.
ORDER
1
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Barron, 127 F.3d 890 (9th Cir.1997), amended by slip. op. 1867, 136 F.3d 675 (March 6, 1998), and the three-judge panel unpublished disposition, United States v. Thompson, 131 F.3d 150 (9th Cir.1997), are withdrawn.
2
These cases are consolidated for rehearing en banc.
