Filed: Aug. 24, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 150 F.3d 1223 Teresita Moral BORJA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Tomas Tabisula BRIONES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 97-70272, 97-70321. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 24, 1998. ORDER HUG, Chief Judge. 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel
Summary: 150 F.3d 1223 Teresita Moral BORJA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Tomas Tabisula BRIONES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 97-70272, 97-70321. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 24, 1998. ORDER HUG, Chief Judge. 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel ..
More
150 F.3d 1223
Teresita Moral BORJA, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
Tomas Tabisula BRIONES, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 97-70272, 97-70321.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 24, 1998.
1
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinions in Borja v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 139 F.3d 1251 (9th Cir.1998) and Briones v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 139 F.3d 1255 (9th Cir.1998) are withdrawn.
2
These cases are consolidated for rehearing en banc.
