Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

00-99005 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 00-99005 Visitors: 41
Filed: Dec. 30, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 315 F.3d 1062 Stevie Lamar FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. Jeanne WOODFORD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. No. 00-99005. No. 00-99006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 6, 2001. Filed February 22, 2002. Amended October 23, 2002. Further Amended December 30, 2002. David S. Olson, Agapay, Levyn & Halling, Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioner-appellant-cross-appellee. Carol Frederick Jo
More

315 F.3d 1062

Stevie Lamar FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
v.
Jeanne WOODFORD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

No. 00-99005.

No. 00-99006.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 6, 2001.

Filed February 22, 2002.

Amended October 23, 2002.

Further Amended December 30, 2002.

David S. Olson, Agapay, Levyn & Halling, Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioner-appellant-cross-appellee.

Carol Frederick Jorstad, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondent-appellee-cross-appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-92-0465-DT.

Before: KOZINSKI, RYMER and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

1

Opinion by Judge RYMER; Concurrence by Judge SILVERMAN.

ORDER

2

The amended opinion filed October 23, 2002 [309 F.3d 1095], is further amended as follows.

3

Slip opinion at 23 [309 F.3d at 1107]: Replace Part II.C with the following:

4

Fields's claim that several of the jurors were racially prejudiced against him fails for lack of any substantial evidence. Even assuming that the declarations upon which he relies are admissible, they are vague and speculative; they do not show that any racist statements were made. Cf., e.g., United States v. Henley, 238 F.3d 1111, 1120-21 (9th Cir.2001) (juror reportedly said something to the effect that "the niggers are guilty"); Tobias v. Smith, 468 F. Supp. 1287, 1289-90 (W.D.N.Y.1979) (jury foreperson said "[y]ou can't tell one black from another.").

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer