Filed: Dec. 06, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 311 F.3d 1132 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, James Aikens; James Francis; Chris Wilson; Shawn Hogya, Intervenors-Appellees, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and James Aikens; James Francis; Chris Wilson; Shawn Hogya, Intervenors-Appellants, v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant, and James Aikens, Intervenor, v. United Par
Summary: 311 F.3d 1132 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, James Aikens; James Francis; Chris Wilson; Shawn Hogya, Intervenors-Appellees, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and James Aikens; James Francis; Chris Wilson; Shawn Hogya, Intervenors-Appellants, v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant, and James Aikens, Intervenor, v. United Parc..
More
311 F.3d 1132
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
James Aikens; James Francis; Chris Wilson; Shawn Hogya, Intervenors-Appellees,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and
James Aikens; James Francis; Chris Wilson; Shawn Hogya, Intervenors-Appellants,
v.
United Parcel Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
James Aikens, Intervenor,
v.
United Parcel Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-15410.
No. 01-15976.
No. 01-15977.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 9, 2002.
Filed September 20, 2002.
Amended December 6, 2002.
1
William J. Kilberg and Thomas G. Hungar, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Washington, DC, for the defendant-appellant-cross-appellee.
2
Barbara L. Sloan, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, DC, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.
3
John J. Mavredakis, Santa Rosa, CA, for the intervenors-appellees-cross-appellants.
4
Laura M. Franze, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Dallas, TX, for the amicus curiae.
5
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; William H. Alsup, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-97-00961-WHA.
6
Before: CANBY and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and BERTELSMAN, Senior District Judge.
ORDER
7
The opinion filed September 20, 2002, is amended as follows:
8
Slip opinion at 14626 [306 F.3d 794], first full paragraph, line 16, delete "so we affirm the judgment as to them."
9
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Rymer voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Canby and Bertelsman so recommended.
10
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App. P. 35.
11
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
