Filed: Jan. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 27 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALFREDO NAVARRO-GUTIERREZ, No. 14-70730 AKA Alfredo Navarro Gutierrez, AKA Alfredo Gutierrez Navarro, Agency No. A078-098-725 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Homeland Security Submitted January 20, 2016 ** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. Alfredo
Summary: FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 27 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALFREDO NAVARRO-GUTIERREZ, No. 14-70730 AKA Alfredo Navarro Gutierrez, AKA Alfredo Gutierrez Navarro, Agency No. A078-098-725 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Homeland Security Submitted January 20, 2016 ** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. Alfredo N..
More
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 27 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALFREDO NAVARRO-GUTIERREZ, No. 14-70730
AKA Alfredo Navarro Gutierrez, AKA
Alfredo Gutierrez Navarro, Agency No. A078-098-725
Petitioner,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Department of Homeland Security
Submitted January 20, 2016 **
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Alfredo Navarro-Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Department of Homeland Security’s (“DHS”) May 9, 2013, order
reinstating his 1999 expedited removal order. Our review is “limited to confirming
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the agency’s compliance with the reinstatement regulations.” Garcia de Rincon v.
DHS,
539 F.3d 1133, 1136-37 (9th Cir. 2008). We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Navarro-Gutierrez’s collateral attack on his
1999 expedited order of removal. See
id. at 1137-38 (our jurisdiction is limited to
reviewing “three discrete inquiries an immigration officer must make in order to
reinstate a removal order: (1) whether the petitioner is an alien; (2) whether the
petitioner was subject to a prior removal order, and (3) whether the petitioner
re-entered illegally”); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A), (e).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
2 14-70730