Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BELAVA, LLC v. FUJI NAILS INC., 2:15-cv-00882 CAS (PJWx). (2015)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20150827722 Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2015
Summary: [PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION CHRISTINA A. SNYDER , District Judge . This Stipulated Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction ("Consent Judgment") is entered into by and between Plaintiff, Belava, LLC ("Belava") and Defendants, Fuji Nails, Inc. and Pana Depot Inc., subject to approval by the Court. On February 6, 2015, Belava initiated this action against Defendants alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. D504,178, trade dress infringement and unfair
More

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

This Stipulated Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction ("Consent Judgment") is entered into by and between Plaintiff, Belava, LLC ("Belava") and Defendants, Fuji Nails, Inc. and Pana Depot Inc., subject to approval by the Court.

On February 6, 2015, Belava initiated this action against Defendants alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. D504,178, trade dress infringement and unfair competition. Belava makes and sells disposable lines for tubs used during pedicures ("Belava Liners"). Belava also makes and sells the tubs for use with the liners ("Belava Tubs"). The complaint arose from Defendants' sale of disposable liners for tubs used during pedicures ("Accused Liners"). Defendants were served with the complaint in the Action on February 13, 2015. Defendants did not answer the complaint, and at Belava's request the Court entered default against Defendants. Subsequently Belava learned that Defendants were offering for sale a counterfeit tub ("Accused Tub").

The Defendants wish to conclude this litigation with Belava without contesting the action, nor the validity or enforceability of the patent-in-suit, as well as without contesting the trade dress claim.

Belava and the Defendants, through their respective counsel, hereby agree to entry of this Consent Judgment.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED,

1. This is an action for patent infringement (35 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.), trade dress infringement and federal unfair competition (Lanham Act Section 43(a), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) et seq.) and unfair competition under California law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.).

2. With respect to the patent and Lanham Act claims this Court has original and/or exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and the Defendants under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) and (b). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction with respect to the state law unfair competition claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

3. Defendants admit that Belava is the owner of all right, title and interest in and to the patent-in-suit and the trade dress associated with the Belava Liners and Belava Tubs.

4. Defendants do not contest that the patent-in-suit is valid and enforceable. 5. Defendants do not contest the trade dress rights associated with the Belava

Liners and Belava Tubs.

6. Defendants represent that they have ceased all sales of the Accused Liners and Accused Tubs.

7. Effective as of the date this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction is entered by the Court, each of the Defendants, and their affiliates and their respective agents, representatives, subsidiaries, directors, principals, officers, successors, assigns, and all others acting in concert or participation with them, and each of them, are hereby permanently enjoined and restrained from importing into the United States, making, using, offering to sell and selling the Accused Liners and the Accused Tubs, as well as any product that is a colorable imitation of those products or the Belava Liner or Belava Tub.

8. The Parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees.

9. This Consent Judgment constitutes a final judgment concerning the subject matter of this action.

10. The Parties waive any right to appeal from this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction.

11. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and provisions of this Consent Judgment and the Permanent Injunction stipulated to herein.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer