Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nomadix, Inc. v. Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd., CV16-08033 AB (FFMx). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20180220a91 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON NOMADIX'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PREVENTING EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH CHARLES REED FREDERICK F. MUMM , Magistrate Judge . Having considered Plaintiff Nomadix's Motion for Protective Order Preventing Ex Parte Communications with Charles Reed and finding good cause therefor based on the danger that Mr. Reed will disclose (whether inadvertently or not) attorney client information if questioned about Nomadix by Guest-Tek, its counsel, or anyone working in connection wit
More

ORDER ON NOMADIX'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PREVENTING EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH CHARLES REED

Having considered Plaintiff Nomadix's Motion for Protective Order Preventing Ex Parte Communications with Charles Reed and finding good cause therefor based on the danger that Mr. Reed will disclose (whether inadvertently or not) attorney client information if questioned about Nomadix by Guest-Tek, its counsel, or anyone working in connection with either, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's motion.

Guest-Tek's attorneys, employees, or representatives shall not communicate with, or otherwise have contact with, Mr. Reed on any topic relating to Nomadix unless Nomadix's attorneys are present.

If Guest-Tek, including its counsel, discovers any failure to comply with this order or any contact with Mr. Reed at odds with this order, Guest-Tek shall promptly notify Nomadix and the Court of the nature and circumstances of the contact, including the method of contact, the information communicated, the date of contact, and the individuals involved in the contact.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer