Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

93-1169 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 93-1169 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 16, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 15 F.3d 186 304 U.S.App.D.C. 367 ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA; The Alliance For Communications Democracy; People for the American Way, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, United States of America, Respondents and Consolidated Cases. No. 93-1169. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Feb. 16, 1994. Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; WALD, EDWARDS, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM. 1 Responde
More

15 F.3d 186

304 U.S.App.D.C. 367

ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA; The Alliance For
Communications Democracy; People for the American
Way, Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, United States of America,
Respondents
and Consolidated Cases.

No. 93-1169.

United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 16, 1994.

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; WALD, EDWARDS, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Respondents' Suggestion For Rehearing In Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

2

ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the suggestion is granted and these cases will be reheard by the court sitting in banc. It is[304 U.S.App.D.C. 368] FURTHER ORDERED, by the court in banc, that the judgment filed herein on November 23, 1993 be, 10 F.3d 812, and the same hereby is, vacated.

3

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer