Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

The Timken Company v. The United States, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., 96-1035 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Number: 96-1035
Filed: Oct. 27, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 70 F.3d 1289 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. The TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., LTD., and Koyo
More

70 F.3d 1289

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
The TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant,
and
Koyo Seiko Co., LTD., and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A.,
Defendants-Appellants.

No. 96-1035.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 27, 1995.

CIT

1

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

2

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer