Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. SILVER PEAK SYSTEMS, INC., CV-13-2980-JSW. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150107652 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 TO CHANGE DATE OF STATUS CONFERENCE JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiff Riverbed Technology, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and defendant Silver Peak Systems, Inc. ("Defendant"). WHEREAS on December 18, 2014, the parties stipulated to vacate the schedule set forth in the Joint Case Management Statement and requested a status conference to enter a new schedule (D.I. 69); WHEREAS on December 30, 2014, the C
More

STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 TO CHANGE DATE OF STATUS CONFERENCE

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiff Riverbed Technology, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and defendant Silver Peak Systems, Inc. ("Defendant").

WHEREAS on December 18, 2014, the parties stipulated to vacate the schedule set forth in the Joint Case Management Statement and requested a status conference to enter a new schedule (D.I. 69);

WHEREAS on December 30, 2014, the Court issued an order granting the parties' stipulation and scheduled a status conference for February 6, 2015 (D.I. 70);

WHEREAS the accompanying declaration of Matthew B. Lehr, lead counsel for Plaintiff, explains that Mr. Lehr will be lead counsel at a trial in Delaware starting February 2nd, 2015 and which is expected to last one to two weeks, and is thus not available to attend the status conference as currently scheduled;

WHEREAS the parties have conferred and Silver Peak does not object to rescheduling the status conference for February 20, 2015, subject to the Court's availability;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties that the status conference is requested to be rescheduled from February 6, 2015 to February 20, 2015, subject to the Court's availability.

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B and Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer