Filed: Jan. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED DISMISSAL ORDER MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. WHEREAS, on July 17, 2013, Plaintiff Toppan Photomasks, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "TPI") filed the above-captioned action (the "Litigation") against Defendant Keun Taek Park ("Defendant" or "Mr. Park") (collectively, the "Parties") WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to end the litigation, and agreed as a basis for doing so to stipulate and agree to the issuance of a permanent injunction (see Doc. No. 104); WHEREAS, on De
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED DISMISSAL ORDER MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. WHEREAS, on July 17, 2013, Plaintiff Toppan Photomasks, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "TPI") filed the above-captioned action (the "Litigation") against Defendant Keun Taek Park ("Defendant" or "Mr. Park") (collectively, the "Parties") WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to end the litigation, and agreed as a basis for doing so to stipulate and agree to the issuance of a permanent injunction (see Doc. No. 104); WHEREAS, on Dec..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED DISMISSAL ORDER
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on July 17, 2013, Plaintiff Toppan Photomasks, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "TPI") filed the above-captioned action (the "Litigation") against Defendant Keun Taek Park ("Defendant" or "Mr. Park") (collectively, the "Parties")
WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to end the litigation, and agreed as a basis for doing so to stipulate and agree to the issuance of a permanent injunction (see Doc. No. 104);
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2014, the Court issued the requested permanent injunction (See Doc. No. 105); and
WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to request that the Court dismiss this action.
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and request the Court to issue the Dismissal in the form attached as Exhibit A.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
