LINEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 4:13-cv-00159-CW. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150116f35
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2015
Summary: LINEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND MERU NETWORKS, INC.'S STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge. Pursuant to Rules 41(a)(2) and 41(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Linex Technologies, Inc. ("Linex") and Defendant Meru Networks, Inc. ("Meru") hereby stipulate to dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted in this action by Linex against Meru and all counterclaims asserted in this action by Meru against Linex. Each party is to bear its own
Summary: LINEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND MERU NETWORKS, INC.'S STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge. Pursuant to Rules 41(a)(2) and 41(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Linex Technologies, Inc. ("Linex") and Defendant Meru Networks, Inc. ("Meru") hereby stipulate to dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted in this action by Linex against Meru and all counterclaims asserted in this action by Meru against Linex. Each party is to bear its own ..
More
LINEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND MERU NETWORKS, INC.'S STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rules 41(a)(2) and 41(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Linex Technologies, Inc. ("Linex") and Defendant Meru Networks, Inc. ("Meru") hereby stipulate to dismiss with prejudice all claims asserted in this action by Linex against Meru and all counterclaims asserted in this action by Meru against Linex. Each party is to bear its own fees and costs.
Linex and Meru further stipulate that this Court retains jurisdiction to adjudicate any matter arising out the settlement agreement that the parties have entered into to resolve their claims against one another.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
