Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wilridge v. Marshall, CV-09-2236-SI. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150127960 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2015
Summary: UNDER SEAL 1 EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ALLOW WITNESS ANTHONY WATSON TO TESTIFY VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. I BACKGROUND Mr. Wilridge anticipates calling Anthony Watson as a witness for the upcoming evidentiary hearing. Mr. Watson is currently housed at California Men's Colony, San Luis Obispo. This Court has already signed a subpoena directing Mr. Watson to appear at the upcoming hearing. However, there is an issue with Mr. Watson traveling to San Francisco. Mr. Wat
More

UNDER SEAL1

EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ALLOW WITNESS ANTHONY WATSON TO TESTIFY VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

I

BACKGROUND

Mr. Wilridge anticipates calling Anthony Watson as a witness for the upcoming evidentiary hearing. Mr. Watson is currently housed at California Men's Colony, San Luis Obispo. This Court has already signed a subpoena directing Mr. Watson to appear at the upcoming hearing. However, there is an issue with Mr. Watson traveling to San Francisco. Mr. Watson suffers from hepatitis C, genotype 1a stage 3-4. See Exhibit A. It is the understanding of undersigned counsel that this is a relatively rare form of hepatitis. Further, he is currently under a sensitive medication regime to treat the hepatitis C and the resultant liver problems. See id. For example, there is one medication that has to be administered on a very specific timetable.

Based on this situation, there is a concern that traveling to San Francisco would interfere with Mr. Watson's medical treatment, and that the necessary medicine/treatment will not be available at whichever temporary facility they house Mr. Watson for the day prior to the hearing.

I have raised this issue with Ms. Jill Thayer, Esq., counsel for the Government in this case. She has stated that she does not oppose this request to have Mr. Watson testify via video-conference.

If a video-conference cannot be arranged, then Mr. Wilridge requests that Mr. Watson be allowed to testify telephonically. Undersigned counsel does not know Ms. Thayer's position regarding Mr. Watson testifying telephonically.

II

DECLARATION OF COUNSEL IN SUPPORT

I, Erick L. Guzman, Declare the following under penalty of perjury:

1. I am the attorney record in the above case. I was appointed pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act; 2. I am admitted to practice in California, and the Northern District of California; 3. I have spoken with Mr. Watson and reviewed the medical documentation he has provided, and I do believe traveling from San Luis Obispo to San Francisco could pose a health risk to Mr. Watson given his sensitive medical situation, and the related medication schedule he is on. 4. I do believe the Litigation Coordination department of California Men's Colony, San Luis Obispo has the facilities to allow Mr. Watson to testify via video-conference. 5. I do believe the Litigation Coordination department of California Men's Colony, San Luis Obispo has the facilities to allow Mr. Watson to testify telephonically.

III

CONCLUSION

Mr. Wilridge respectfully requests this Court to order that Mr. Watson be allowed to testify via video-conference, and he not be brought to San Francisco for the upcoming evidentiary hearing.

[PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING ANTHONY WATSON TO TESTIFY VIA VIDEO-CONFERENCE, OR, IN THE ALTERANTIVE, ALLOWING MR. WATSON TO TESTIFY TELEPHONICALLY

For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Anthony Watson be permitted to testify via video for the upcoming February 4, 2015 evidentiary hearing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the alternative, if video-conference is not available, that Mr. Watson be permitted to testify telephonically for the upcoming February 4, 2015 evidentiary hearing.

IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that Anthony Watson not be transported to San Francisco for the evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, the previously signed writ ad testificandum be vacated as to Anthony Watson only.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit A

CHRONIC CARE FOLLOWUP VISIT/PROGRESS NOTE

NAME: WATSON, ANTHONY CDCR#: P56486 DATE OF SERVICE: 10/29/2012 DATE OF BIRTH: 12/27/1966 HOUSING: C 006 1195001U PAROLE DATE:

TIME: 8:30

REASON FOR VISIT: Chronic Care.

CHRONIC MEDICAL PROBLEMS:

1. Hepatitis C.

2. Migraine headaches.

3. Gastroesophageal reflux disease.

SUBJECTIVE:

1. The patient has a history of hepatitis C, genotype 1a, stage 3-4. He was referred for treatment and his case has been submitted to Sacramento for approval. He has a followup with Dr. Park. He denies any abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, melena, or hematochezia. He denies any lower extremity edema.

2. Migraine headaches. He is having headaches associated with light sensitivity about every two weeks. He is currently having headache now. He previously had Imitrex but has been off because he has been on Zoloft. He also has a history of heartburn and this is controlled with Zantac.

MEDICATIONS: Reviewed.

ALLERGIES: NO KNOWN DRUG ALLERGIES.

OBJECTIVE/OBSERVATION: VITAL SIGNS: Temperature 96.6, pulse 51, blood pressure 141/87, respirations 20. Oxygen saturation 98%. Height: 5 feet 8 inches. Weight: 195 pounds. Body mass index: 29. GENERAL: The patient appears in no acute distress. Conjunctivae are anicteric. LUNGS: Clear. CARDIOVASCULAR: Regular rate and rhythm. ABDOMEN: Soft and nontender. EXTREMITIES: No edema.

LABORATORY DATA/DIAGNOSTIC DATA: On 10/12/2012, hepatitis C viral load 423,000. AST 71, ALT 107. INR 1.2. Hemoglobin 13.6. Platelets 69,000/

ASSESSMENT/PLAN:

1. Hepatitis C, genotype I a, stage 3-4. No evidence of decompensated cirrhosis. Follow up with Dr. Park for possible treatment.

2. Migraine headache. Fair control, slightly worse. 1 started him on Tylenol No. 3 for 3 days for his acute headache and will place him on Depakote for migraine prophylaxis.

3. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, good control, stable. Continue Zantac.

EDUCATION: The patient verbalized understanding of assessment and plan.

FOLLOWUP: Followup in 90 days.

MEDICAL PROGRESS NOTE

NAME: WATSON, ANTHONY CDCR#: P56486 DATE OF SERVICE: 10/29/2012 DATE OF BIRTH: 12/27/1966 HOUSING: C 006 1195001U PAROLE DATE:

TIME:

CHIEF COMPLAINT: Hepatitis C treatment evaluation.

SUBJECTIVE: The patient is here for followup for his hepatitis C treatment evaluation. He has no complaints. He has no abdominal pain, GI bleeding, or fatigue.

MEDICATIONS: Medication reconciliation form reviewed.

ALLERGIES:

OBJECTIVE: VITAL SIGNS: Temperature 98.3, pulse 55, blood pressure 120/71, respirations 14. Weight 201. GENERAL: No acute distress. SKIN: No rash. HEENT: Sclerae anicteric. Oropharynx clear. LUNGS: Clear to auscultation bilaterally. HEART: Regular rate and rhythm. ABDOMEN: Soft, nontender, nondistended. EXTREMITIES: No clubbing, cyanosis or edema. NEUROLOGICAL: Alert and oriented x3:

LABORATORY DATA: On 06/29/2012, WBC 3.1, hemoglobin 12.9, platelets 79,000. On 10/12/2012, white blood cell count 2.8, platelet count 69,000, hemoglobin 13.6, INR 1.2, AST 71, ALT 107., TSH 0.6, total bilirubin 0.8, albumin 4.5, Heptimax RNA 423,000, genotype la. On 11/27/2012, white blood cell count 3.4, hemoglobin 13.1, platelets 74,000.

ASSESSMENT/PLAN: Chronic hepatitis C, genotype I a. Ile has 3-4 fibrosis on biopsy. He is on divalproex. This could be impacting his platelets. We will stop his divalproex and repeat his laboratories.

EDUCATION: The patient verbalized understanding of assessment and plan.

FOLLOWUP: Follow up in 4 weeks.

FootNotes


1. This pleading is being filed under seal because it reveals sensitive medical information regarding Mr. Watson. Undersigned counsel will provide a copy of this pleading to opposing counsel at the time of filing.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer