KINESTRAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. FILASER, INC., 4:14-CV-03005-DMR. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150128h84
Visitors: 33
Filed: Jan. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2015
Summary: ORDER DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation re Briefing Schedule Delendant Filaser, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 12(b)(6) Motion and Alternative Motions to Make More Definite and Certain and/or Strike Motion (hereinafter "Stipulation"), filings and docket herein, and duly considered the Stipulation as presented to the Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Stipulation x is GRANTED ___________ is DENIED. Defendant's Reply Brief in Support of Pla
Summary: ORDER DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation re Briefing Schedule Delendant Filaser, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 12(b)(6) Motion and Alternative Motions to Make More Definite and Certain and/or Strike Motion (hereinafter "Stipulation"), filings and docket herein, and duly considered the Stipulation as presented to the Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Stipulation x is GRANTED ___________ is DENIED. Defendant's Reply Brief in Support of Plai..
More
ORDER
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation re Briefing Schedule Delendant Filaser, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 12(b)(6) Motion and Alternative Motions to Make More Definite and Certain and/or Strike Motion (hereinafter "Stipulation"), filings and docket herein, and duly considered the Stipulation as presented to the Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
The Stipulation
x is GRANTED
___________ is DENIED.
Defendant's Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 12(b)(6) Motion and Alternative Motions to Make More Definite and Certain and/or Strike shall be field with the Court on February 2, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
