Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER LITIGATION, 3-13-cv-3072-EMC. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150209637 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the remaining causes of action asserted in the First Amended Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 47) by Plaintiffs Art Avedisian, Angela Battle, Grif Rosser, and Jason Zuchowski (the "Dismissed Plaintiffs") against Defendant Ford Motor Company are DISMIS
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the remaining causes of action asserted in the First Amended Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 47) by Plaintiffs Art Avedisian, Angela Battle, Grif Rosser, and Jason Zuchowski (the "Dismissed Plaintiffs") against Defendant Ford Motor Company are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The parties further stipulate and agree that such dismissal shall not prevent the Dismissed Plaintiffs from participating in any recovery or other remedies to which they would otherwise be entitled by virtue of their qualification for membership in any class or subclass certified by the Court in this litigation. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties expressly agree that this dismissal shall not affect the Dismissed Plaintiffs' ability to submit claims in connection with any claims administration procedure approved by the Court in this litigation for which they would otherwise be eligible.

In agreeing to this stipulation, Defendant expressly reserves its right to seek depositions of the Dismissed Plaintiffs and to seek payment of costs reasonably incurred in preparing its defense to the Dismissed Plaintiffs' claims. The Dismissed Plaintiffs likewise reserve their rights to oppose and object to any request for deposition of the Dismissed Plaintiffs, and/or for payment of costs, and/or any other relief, made by Defendant.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, it is SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer