Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HENSLEY-MacLEAN v. SAFEWAY INC., 11-01230 RS. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150211a33 Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULES FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties respectfully submit this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending the Briefing Schedules for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. On December 22,
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULES FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties respectfully submit this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending the Briefing Schedules for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification.

On December 22, 2014, the Court entered a Stipulated Order extending the class certification schedule to allow additional time for discovery (Dkt. #158). Pursuant to that order, Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is currently due on February 26, 2015, Safeway's opposition is due on March 19, 2015, Plaintiffs' reply is due on April 9, 2015, and the hearing is scheduled for June 11, 2015 at 1:30 p.m.

On January 26, 2015, Safeway filed its Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 165), which challenges Plaintiffs' standing to bring this suit. Plaintiffs' opposition is currently due February 9, 2015, Safeway's reply is due February 17, 2015, and the hearing is currently scheduled for March 19, 2015 at 1:30 p.m.

The parties propose that Safeway's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment be resolved prior to Plaintiffs bringing any Motion for Class Certification since the motion raises the issue of whether Plaintiffs have standing and thus whether this Court has jurisdiction over this suit. Plaintiffs also requests additional time to respond to Safeway's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment, including to complete depositions already planned and to conduct discovery targeted at the issues raised in Safeway's standing arguments, specifically, whether the 6 count packages of Lucerne eggs purchased by one of the named Plaintiffs was exempt from the 2010 egg recall. Accordingly, the parties propose and stipulate to extend the foregoing schedule as follows:

1. Safeway's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment. a) Plaintiffs' opposition due February 23, 2015. b) Safeway's reply due March 9, 2015. c) Hearing set for April 30, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. 2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. a) Plaintiffs' motion for class certification, if necessary, to be due twenty days after the Court issues an order ruling on Safeway's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment. b) Safeway's opposition due within 28 days of Plaintiffs' motion. c) Plaintiffs' reply due within 14 days of Safeway's opposition. d) Hearing set for the first available hearing date following Plaintiffs' reply or at the date most convenient to the Court.

The parties further stipulate and agree that until an order is issued on Safeway's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment, discovery shall be limited to and narrowly tailored to address issues raised by Safeway's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer