Filed: Feb. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 17, 2014 SCHEDULING ORDER JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Plaintiff WhatsApp Inc. ("WhatsApp") and Defendant Intercarrier Communications, LLC ("ICC") hereby respectfully submit this joint motion to extend the deadlines set forth in the Court's November 16, 2014 Scheduling Order (Dkt. 107). The parties have been and are currently engaged in negotiations for amicable resolution of the above-captioned matter and request additional ti
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 17, 2014 SCHEDULING ORDER JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Plaintiff WhatsApp Inc. ("WhatsApp") and Defendant Intercarrier Communications, LLC ("ICC") hereby respectfully submit this joint motion to extend the deadlines set forth in the Court's November 16, 2014 Scheduling Order (Dkt. 107). The parties have been and are currently engaged in negotiations for amicable resolution of the above-captioned matter and request additional tim..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THE COURT'S NOVEMBER 17, 2014 SCHEDULING ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Plaintiff WhatsApp Inc. ("WhatsApp") and Defendant Intercarrier Communications, LLC ("ICC") hereby respectfully submit this joint motion to extend the deadlines set forth in the Court's November 16, 2014 Scheduling Order (Dkt. 107). The parties have been and are currently engaged in negotiations for amicable resolution of the above-captioned matter and request additional time to further these discussions.
According to the Court's most recent Scheduling Order, ICC is supposed to serve updated infringement contentions and supporting evidence today, February 10, 2015. The parties have conferred, and subject to the Court's approval, the parties agree to amend the Court's November 17, 2014 Scheduling Order to move this deadline to March 10, 2015 and the remainder of the deadlines as follows:
Event Original Deadline Amended Deadline
ICC serves updated February 10, 2015 March 10, 2015
infringement contentions and
supporting evidence
ICC files motion for leave to February 19, 2015 March 19, 2015
amend its infringement
contentions
WhatsApp files its limited March 17, 2015 April 14, 2015
motion for summary judgment
of non-infringement
Summary Judgment April 7, 2015 May 5, 2015
opposition
Summary Judgment reply April 21, 2015 May 19, 2015
Summary Judgment hearing May 12, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. June 9, 20151
Parties submit further joint 14 days after the Court 14 days after the Court
case management statement rules on WhatsApp's rules on WhatsApp's
proposing a schedule through limited motion for limited motion for
trial summary judgment summary judgment
The case schedule was previously modified, as follows:
1. The time for the case management conference was previously extended from December 11, 2013 to January 22, 2014. 2. The time to exchange preliminary claim constructions and supporting evidence was extended from May 5, 2014 to May 13, 2014.
3. The time for ICC to file a replacement opening claim construction brief was extended from July 21, 2014 to July 23, 2014.
4. The time for WhatsApp to file its claim construction brief was extended from August 4, 2014 to August 5, 2014.
5. The time for ICC to file its reply claim construction brief was extended from August 11, 2014 to August 18, 2014.
6. The time for the technology tutorial hearing was extended from September 8, 2014 to September 30, 2014.
7. The time for the claim construction hearing was extended from September 23, 2014 to October 14, 2014.
8. The time for WhatsApp to serve its supplemental invalidity contentions was extended from October 27, 2014 to November 12, 2014.
9. The time for the parties to serve its Further Joint Case Management Statement was extended from November 5, 2014 to November 7, 2014 and again to November 11, 2014.
WHEREFORE, WhatsApp and ICC respectfully request the Court to modify its November 16, 2014 Scheduling Order to permit the extensions as set forth above.
FILER'S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Richard G. Frenkel hereby attests that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.