INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. TOLAT, C 12-06575 JSW. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150213835
Visitors: 69
Filed: Feb. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DE NOVO MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("Report") issued by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendant Viral Tolat's motion for attorneys' fees and costs. On December 26, 2014, Defendant filed objections to the Report and a motion for de novo determination of fees.
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DE NOVO MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("Report") issued by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendant Viral Tolat's motion for attorneys' fees and costs. On December 26, 2014, Defendant filed objections to the Report and a motion for de novo determination of fees. P..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DE NOVO MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("Report") issued by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendant Viral Tolat's motion for attorneys' fees and costs. On December 26, 2014, Defendant filed objections to the Report and a motion for de novo determination of fees.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the motion noticed for hearing on Friday, February 27, 2015 at 9:00 a.m., is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing date is hereby VACATED. Having considered the Report, the parties' papers, relevant legal authority, the record in this case,1 and having reviewed the matter de novo, the Court finds the Report thorough and well-reasoned and adopts it in every respect.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion for attorneys' fees and costs is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. In addition, Defendant's administrative motion to augment the record is GRANTED and Plaintiff's request to further supplement the record is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
