Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HEALY v. FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, 3:14-cv-00832-RS. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150218764 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Plaintiff Lizabeth Healy, and Defendants Union Security Insurance Company (formerly known as Fortis Benefits Insurance Company), Assurant Employee Benefits (which "exists" as a brand name only), and Lighthouse Capital Partners Long Term Disability Plan hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The parties shall file cross-motions for summary judgment on or before February 5, 2015. 2. The parties shall file oppositions there
More

STIPULATION TO AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Plaintiff Lizabeth Healy, and Defendants Union Security Insurance Company (formerly known as Fortis Benefits Insurance Company), Assurant Employee Benefits (which "exists" as a brand name only), and Lighthouse Capital Partners Long Term Disability Plan hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The parties shall file cross-motions for summary judgment on or before February 5, 2015. 2. The parties shall file oppositions thereto no later than February 26, 2015. 3. The hearing on the cross-motions shall take place on March 19, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3. 4. The documents marked as US 1-5981 inclusive represent Defendant Union Security Insurance Company's administrative record with respect to Plaintiff's claim for disability benefits. Defendants shall submit this record in electronic form along with their moving papers.

ATTESTATION OF ELECTRONIC FILING

As the attorney for Defendant e-filing this document, I hereby attest that Rebecca Grey concurred in this filing.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer