Filed: Feb. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ISSUES VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record and subject to the Court's approval, stipulate as follows: RECITALS WHEREAS, on December 30, 2014, the parties have entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the "Stipulation") to resolve this matter, subject to Court approval; WHEREAS, on January 22, 2015, the Court held a hearing (the "January 22 Hearing"
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ISSUES VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record and subject to the Court's approval, stipulate as follows: RECITALS WHEREAS, on December 30, 2014, the parties have entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the "Stipulation") to resolve this matter, subject to Court approval; WHEREAS, on January 22, 2015, the Court held a hearing (the "January 22 Hearing")..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ON SETTLEMENT APPROVAL ISSUES
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record and subject to the Court's approval, stipulate as follows:
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on December 30, 2014, the parties have entered into a Stipulation of Settlement (the "Stipulation") to resolve this matter, subject to Court approval;
WHEREAS, on January 22, 2015, the Court held a hearing (the "January 22 Hearing") on whether it should grant preliminary approval to the settlement set forth the Stipulation;
WHEREAS, the Court raised certain questions during the January 22 Hearing and by orders entered January 23 and 27, 2015, the Court posed certain questions to the parties, asking that the parties respond to them in a supplemental brief concerning preliminary settlement approval to be filed on or before February 20, 2015;
WHEREAS, the parties have been discussing the possibility of certain modifications to the Stipulation intended to respond to issues raised by the Court at the January 22 Hearing, and defendant has been collecting certain data requested by the Court;
WHEREAS, the parties believe that the Court's consideration of the proposed settlement would be enhanced if the parties first reach final positions on, and to the extent applicable document, potential modifications to the Stipulation, and if those issues were incorporated into the supplemental brief that the Court has requested; and
WHEREAS, pre-existing business travel will result in counsel for the parties being out of town for much of the balance of February, making it more difficult for the parties to confer and con; THEREFORE, subject to the Court's approval, the parties agree as follows:
STIPULATION
The date by which the parties shall file their joint supplemental brief responding to the Court's questions related to settlement approval is extended two weeks, to and including Friday, March 6, 2015.
SO STIPULATED.
>PROPOSED ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties and upon good cause showing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the date by which the parties shall file their joint supplemental brief responding to the Court's questions related to settlement approval is extended two weeks, to and including Friday, March 6, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
